Have you ever wondered why more people aren’t enthralled by cryptic crosswords? I don’t just mean younger generations – why is it your friends and family aren’t hanging out each day for the latest cryptic challenge? I bet many of them enjoy “normal” crosswords, so why is it they don’t naturally migrate to cryptics over time? I remember being taught how to solve The Guardian cryptic in the Sun-Herald in year 10 (at 15 years old) by my English teacher – he not only taught us every school week how to solve but questions on cryptics turned up in term tests and the end-of-year exam. There was a big incentive to learn how do them yet a relatively small number of us actually enjoyed this part of his English curriculum. I think the same goes in the population generally: not everyone thinks the right way necessary to crack cryptics, even though they are quite comfortable with all other kinds of word puzzles. I’ve always believed a maths bent helped me embrace and get good at solving, and I think the fact that English was my worst subject (marks-wise) in senior school bears that out. Recently the results of a study by Kathryn Friedlander and Philip Fine from University of Buckingham confirmed that cryptic solvers and solvers of advanced cryptics in particular are more likely to have a science/maths background. Have a look at the study here. I must warn you that it’s academic in nature and not a relaxing read, but the findings are interesting. The researchers used info from questionnaires filled in by solvers sourced through various crossword-related websites. I’m not sure if the numbers tell us about how many people are actually solving crosswords compared to years gone by, but it does tell us quite a lot about the age-groups of current solvers (who are internet-savvy), and their make-up.
I was thinking of running a small anonymous survey on this website about crossword things – who’d like to participate?
Across | Answers and Clues | Explanations |
1 | LOOK BACK | |
Rubber-stamp in a block changed to “Remember” (4,4) | OK inside anagram of A BLOCK | |
5 | WHACKS | |
Slugs grow by the sound of it (6) | Sounds like WAX | |
10 | CAESIUM | |
Metal case affected one pump lacking any pressure (7) | Anagram of CASE + I + (PUMP – P+P) | |
11 | RUNS LOW | |
Dodgy urn, heating gently, becomes depleted (4,3) | Anagram of URN + SLOW | |
12 | MENSA | |
Toilet built by a group of smart people (5) | MENS + A | |
13 | IN THE REAR | |
Train diverted around here is behind (2,3,4) | Anagram of TRAIN outside HERE | |
14 | LIKE ANYTHING | |
South Korean company acquiring Ikea, New York, wasted very much (4,8) | LG outside (IKEA + NY + THIN) | |
18 | ALTERCATIONS | |
Exchanges involving heat convert electrically charged particles (12) | ALTER + CATIONS | |
21 | STAND FIRM | |
Stone as well as tree might initially offer good resistance (5,4) | ST + AND + FIR + (M)IGHT | |
23 | EUROS | |
Money and stock of entrepreneur ostensibly (5) | entreprenEUR OStensibly | |
24 | GUINEAN | |
Colt, perhaps, carrying in each African (7) | GUN outside (IN + EA) | |
25 | TRIBUNE | |
Champion of popular rights Guy portrayed in song (7) | RIB inside TUNE | |
26 | RUGOSE | |
Pass inserted into device is creased (6) | GO inside RUSE | |
27 | FLAGRANT | |
Notorious member of the family moved into apartment (8) | GRAN inside FLAT | |
Down | Answers and Clues | Explanations |
1 | LOCUMS | |
Clergymen acting married in place (6) | M inside LOCUS | |
2 | OCEANS | |
Canoes handled rough seas (6) | Anagram of CANOES | |
3 | BRIGADIER | |
Officer is right behind prison with a pass (9) | R after (BRID + A + DIE) | |
4 | COMMISERATIONS | |
Mean person in deep sleep is not prepared for bad luck (14) | (MISER inside COMA) + anagram of IS NOT | |
6 | HINGE | |
Flexible joint and section of clutch in gearbox (5) | clutcH IN GEarbox | |
7 | CALLER ID | |
Representation of dialler after connecting initially? (6,2) | Anagram of DIALLER after (C)ONNECTING | |
8 | SEWERAGE | |
Sheep farmer finally invested in wise disposal system (8) | [EWE + (FARME(R)] inside SAGE | |
9 | BRITANNIA METAL | |
Ban material mixed with tin alloy (9,5) | Anagram of BAN MATERIAL and TIN | |
15 | TENDERING | |
Caring home added to grand offering (9) | TENDER + IN + G | |
16 | MASSAGER | |
Service gear in poor condition is rubber (8) | MASS + anagram of GEAR | |
17 | STEAMING | |
Tell all about cooperative unit moving at great speed (8) | SING outside TEAM | |
19 | TRAUMA | |
Disorientated amateur lacking energy is suffering (6) | Anagram of AMATEUR minus E | |
20 | ASSENT | |
Agreement, for instance, broadcast over the airwaves (6) | AS + SENT | |
22 | DRESS | |
Stray not needing one thousand dollars for outfit (5) | DIGRESS minus (I + G) |
Of course – David
I always thought cryptics were “too hard” –
was gently introduced to them by a friend later in life (as in – you can do this) –
so it’s gone on from there –
just requires development of different & ultimately very rewarding ways of thinking.
At first I always avoided multi-word answers, now can’t get enough of them.
Yes. I am in for a survey.
Happy to participate in a survey.
Steve = : ^ )
I preferred maths/science over English mainly because with the latter you were taught that you got a good mark for mimicking well. With the former two, it was very a very objective assessment and you could approach it as a puzzle.
Some, who had bad memories of maths classes, have told me that they enjoyed learning maths in later life when they needed to create a spreadsheet for calculations. This was partly because they didn’t want to please anyone but merely to get the spreadsheet right. I suspected that this was why boys traditionally leant towards maths/science and why boys were being left behind as teaching changed to suit girls more.
Which brings me to another question, apart from the former compiler for the Age, EM, how many women do it?